Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Friday 11 September 2009 16:57:54 Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>> Hallo,
>>
>>> mac80211 (or some other part of the networking stack) triggers this
>>> warning in the NOHZ code: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
>>>
>>> 08 seems to be NET_RX_SOFTIRQ.
>>>
>>> It happens, because my test driver b43 handles all RX and TX-status
>>> callbacks in process context. I guess some part of the networking
>>> stack expects RX to be in tasklet and/or softirq context.
>>>
>>> We also have a report of this warning in wl1251, so it's probably not
>>> a b43 problem.
>> Yes, I see this with wl1251. It uses workqueues everywhere.
>>
>
> This patch seems to fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Index: wireless-testing/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> ===================================================================
> --- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/cfg.c 2009-08-09 18:47:11.000000000 +0200
> +++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/cfg.c 2009-09-11 16:59:12.000000000 +0200
> @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static void ieee80211_send_layer2_update
> skb->dev = sta->sdata->dev;
> skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, sta->sdata->dev);
> memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(skb->cb));
> - netif_rx(skb);
> + ieee80211_netif_rx(skb);
> }
>
> static void sta_apply_parameters(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> Index: wireless-testing/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
> ===================================================================
> --- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h 2009-08-23 00:06:41.000000000 +0200
> +++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h 2009-09-11 17:02:05.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1053,6 +1053,14 @@ void ieee80211_tx_pending(unsigned long
> int ieee80211_monitor_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev);
> int ieee80211_subif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev);
>
> +/* rx handling */
> +static inline int ieee80211_netif_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + if (in_interrupt())
> + return netif_rx(skb);
> + return netif_rx_ni(skb);
> +}
> +
Hello Michael,
i know this NOHZ warning from the CAN stack also - but now, i know what caused
this warning. I fixed it in my local tree and it works. Thanks!
As there are several users in the kernel do exact this test and call the
appropriate netif_rx() function, i would suggest to create a static inline
function:
static inline int netif_rx_ti(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (in_interrupt())
return netif_rx(skb);
return netif_rx_ni(skb);
}
('ti' for test in_interrupt())
in include/linux/netdevice.h
What do you think about that?
Regards,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
