> This is a bit weird -- this way you don't report errors if the > user specified frequencies that don't exist. Couldn't / shouldn't this done in user-space, e.g. after checking IWRANGE. > Also, are you sure that it has to be a frequency as opposed to > a channel number? I'm not totally sure, because there's nowhere any documentation about the exact meanings of fields in "struct iw_freq". My patch for wpa_supplicant's driver_wext.c only put's a frequency there: + req.channel_list[i].m = params->freqs[i] * 100000; + req.channel_list[i].e = 1; + req.channel_list[i].i = i; + req.channel_list[i].flags = 0; But now that you bring this into my mind, I should have looked at another consumer of "struct iw_freq", e.g. I should use cfg80211_wext_freq() like cfg80211_wext_siwfreq() ?!? I'll prepare some patch. -- http://www.holgerschurig.de -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
