On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 15:27 +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On 09 Sep 03, Ivo Van Doorn wrote: > > > USB_DEVICE(0x148f, 0x2573) is served by the rt73usb driver where it is already > > > defined. Remove it from rt2500usb. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > NACK > > > > Users have reported that this is a valid rt2500usb ID. You can thank the > > manufacturer of the dongle to produce dongles with the same USB ID but > > with different chipsets. > > > > Ivo > > Interesting. On my laptop, without this patch both the drivers are loaded > (lsmod), rt2500usb aborts without allocating a device successfully but I am > unable to associate to the AP. Sounds like the detection logic is somehow messing with the device, or rt2500usb isn't actually freeing the device for rt73usb to bind? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
