On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 15:40 -0600, Tim Gardner wrote: > Wouldn't that make it difficult to experiment with external rate scaling > algorithms? Not that minstrel or the other in-driver rate scaling > algorithms always get it right, but they are certainly more transparent > (and changeable) then firmware. It does, in theory, but then again you don't really _have_ the choice. iwlagn only lets you control the rate on the host to some extent, there's not a lot we can do. IMHO using the rate control algorithms like they are now is a kludge because we've always needed a rate control algorithm, but it's still not really useful. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
