On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Richard Farina<sidhayn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I apologize if you thought there was an accusation here, that certainly was > not my intention. With all due respect assuming that I'm > a jerk is neither safe nor polite. In your original patch for this I find > the following text: > Yes, I realize that, which is why I said the "bug is still alive" not "the > patch is not applied". I even went out of my way to describe how the > testing was different... While I thought Larry's reply was a bit brief, I looked back on the thread and I think I am on Larry's side. All you mentioned was that you had a crash on unplug, and then you automatically assume that it is because the most recent crash-related fix (which Larry kindly made) did not work. You have no proof that your problem is even the same as what the fix tried to solve. You did not try to go back to a non-LED enabled compat-wireless, for example. To be honest, I think you 'went out of your way' to try to pin your problem on one of the developers, so that your problem is guaranteed to receive attention. That's not very fair... That said, I think this thread has gone on long enough - all that happened is that (1) you had a crash on unplug, (2) you tried to pin it on Larry, (3) many people has checked and verified that what Larry did went in, (4) we still don't know whether your crash is related to the LED change or not. Since we still don't know whether your crash is related to any LED-related change or not, this thread is not going well. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
