On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 15:06 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > Neat, thanks. Not sure if I'll get to this this anytime soon, but if > > someone is interested in it please give it a shot and send a patch. > > That would be nice. > > What if we *also* just do that from mac80211 as well upstream? Why? It's fine as it is, and we don't want to clutter all cfg80211 drivers with it. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
