On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 17:04 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote: > I've reworked RTS/CTS since then, just haven't got to sending a new > proposal yet. The current plan is as follows: > > TX_FLAGS & 0x0002: Use CTS > TX_FLAGS & 0x0004: Use RTS > TX_FLAGS & 0x0020: Disable RTS/CTS usage Seems a bit strange, wouldn't setting neither RTS nor CTS have the effect? Seems like 0x20 should rather be "use automatic and ignore the other bits". Anyway, not appropriate here, you should just bring a new proposal. > If I remember correctly, I made an implementation for the Linux kernel > (a generator-side implementation) and one for Wireshark (a parser-side > implementation). Or should I make two generator-side implementations > according to the requirement (e.g. one for Linux, another for > OpenBSD)? No, that was ok, I just meant that therefore by definition it can't be a problem of lack of implementations. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
