Note: this e-mail is on a public mailing list. I'm adding David and Michael. On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:23:39AM +0100, Simon Farnsworth wrote: > On Thursday 20 August 2009 01:20:58 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Simon Farnsworth<simon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > As I'm trying to use the cards for AP mode, I cannot rely on beacons with > > > regulatory data being present; > > > > Regulatory questions are often and I try really hard to answer them > > first through documentation so it seems we need to improve > > documentation further. To be thorough though I'd first like to ask if > > you have read all this: > > > > Linux regulatory docs: > > > > http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Regulatory > > > > Atheros shared module documentation (ath.ko): > > > > http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath > > > I've read both of those - they're why I'm not simply overriding the EEPROM > by hacking ath5k.ko around. Great to hear. > > > instead, I have modprobe configured to run > > > "iw reg set GB" after cfg80211 is loaded, > > > > How do you have modprove configured to do that? Are you using > > ieee80211_regdom module parameter? If so please consider just using > > 'iw' or hostapd configured as you have below. > > > > In /etc/modprobe.d/regulatory, I have a line: > install cfg80211 /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install cfg80211 ; /usr/local/sbin/iw reg set GB Heh, interesting, yeah I guess I have to test such a concoction and I guess using the ieee80211_regdom parameter will do the same. Anyway, this is will only help compliance, and since you are already setting this on hostapd setting it twice will yield an -EALREADY, so I recommend to just do it once and if you do want to set it, set it on hostapd. > > > My cards both have a regdomain in the EEPROM of 0x0, > > > > This is something that the manufacturer would have decided on. > > > > > which my vendor assures > > > me is the correct regdomain for cards which don't claim any particular > > > regulatory compliance, > > > > Who exactly did you speak to? > > > > Atheros uses 0x0 for a default mapping to the US. > > > > I spoke to Mikrotik, who manufactured the R52 card I'm using. They assured > me that EEPROM regdomain 0x0 was correct for a card with no knowledge of > what regulatory domain it would be sold in, and in any case, told me that > it works fine with the driver they have from Atheros, so it must be an > upstream kernel bug. Please kindly inform them that this information is incorrect. 0x0 is to be used by Atheros devices to map to the "US", always. Mikrotek just so happens to be a manufacturer who sells cards for AP purposes. Ubiquity is another example but I am aware Ubiquity sells Atheros *modified* hardware to operate either with higher EIRP or on different frequency ranges. Anyway, manufactuers in general who sell hardware with intentions of supporting AP mode have to test their cards for proper operation and calibration and for regulatory purposes. This is why you see these cards come with their own FCC ID attached. So be aware, 0x0 will always map to the US. If the manufacturer did not intend to do that they can provide their own regulatory.bin to customers where they can map "US" to their own defined regulatory domain. For you to use their regulatory.bin they can make public their RSA public key generated by building a modified wireless-regdb so users can compile crda to trust it. The pubkey from the manfuacturer can be put into the crda/pubkeys/ before compilation. If the manufacturer uses another value to put into the EEPROM they should use whatever country that value maps to to build their own regulatory.bin. If the manufacturer intended for the card they sell to be used in different countries *and* they support letting users change the country they can add those countries they have tested for regulatory support and have regulatory certification onto their regulatory.bin, in this case the default EEPROM mapping should yield a large regulatory domain which allows the full capability they want to allow for on their cards. That is if their cards are programmed with 0x0 then since ath.ko will ask for regulatory_hint("US") for Atheros devices they must map "US" to a big regulatory domain, and next their customers can use 'iw reg set' or embed the country code as you have in hostapd.conf so that it then restricts the regulatory settings further to fit the country you are in, that is the intersection between the big regulatory domain and the one intended. Granted this means if they used "0x0" "US" is already taken, so they could either provide patches for ath.ko for their customers so that "0x0" does not match to "US" all the time but to something else like a debug mode like "ZZ", or maybe numbers "50" maybe, although I forget if this will fail right now on cfg80211, or simply use another alpah2 for "US" for their customers. Keep in mind though that the functionality to support country selection for AP operation is something that I understand as not welcomed by the FCC so I would be careful in considertion supporting this as a manufacturer for users in the US. Anyway the advantage of all this is all this can be supported now through userspace. It used to be some manufacturers had to provide patches on top of the supported Atheros driver to support custom regulatory domains. Provided the manfucturer has tested a regulatory domain this is no longer required and these changes can now be done completey in userspace. Feel free to refer Mikrotek, Ubiquity, or any manufacturer selling Atheros cards to support AP mode to the above. They should first test their stuff though :) > > > thus preventing legal > > > use of the WiFi bands, but allowing me illegal use. > > > > This is no different than considering the case of when you ship an > > access point from JP to the US and you start beaconing on channel 13. > > You are violating local US regulatory laws if your configuration was > > to beacon on channel 13. If you take a US AP to the JP you then are > > prevented from usage of the allowed channel 13. > > > > I realize it may seem silly, and in fact I agree, but that is the law. > > If you were to bring an AP from JP to the US *with* a regulatory > > domain which matches the JP SKUs and therefore are allowed to beacon > > on channel 13 we give you the flexibility in Linux to enhance > > compliance and indicate you are on in the US and disable channel 13. > > Now, as much as I would love for it to be the case that the other way > > around should be enabled it is not, and although technically it is > > feasible, it is just not something agreeable to current regulatory > > agencies. Maybe one day it will be for 802.11, who knows. > > > > Anyway in your case since the device sends a regulatory hint for "US" > > first, and then you say "GB" the card will *always* respect first > > "US", and "GB" is just used to further help compliance. > > > > So, if I understand correctly, this is not considered a bug by you or the > card manufacturer, both of whom insist that the other one is wrong. Am I > right in thinking that the easiest way to resolve this is to stick with an > unmodified kernel, but to use my own regulatory database that treats US as > GB? Your manufacturer has their information incorrect in thinking 0x0 maps to some debug mode to allow all channels. 0x0 maps to "US" by default on Atheros drivers. See the above explanation for what your manufacturer *can* do. > > > Secondly, I'm seeing different regulatory settings on each card. "iw > > > list" shows me that in the 2GHz band, phy1 is being allowed to use 27.0 > > > dBm on channels 1-11, whereas I'm only allowed to use 20.0 dBm, but I'm > > > allowed channels 1-13. > > > > I did not understand the last part, can you rephrase this again? > > > > Easiest to look at the full iw list output below, and remember that my > local regulatory domain is GB, which is also the domain the cards were sold > as having. OK I'll try to do that, but again, I think we already spotted the main issue here: your manufacturer should be notified 0x0 is intended by Atheros drivers to map to the "US". For support for new upstream Atheros Linux drivers (in the Linux kernel) they should revisit how they should support customers for regulatory purposes in light of the new regulatory infrastructure which does allow them to modify the regulatory database in userspace and sign off on it. I'll look into the other logs through another thread. Feel free to refer manufacturers to this e-mail for documentation purposes. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
