On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 10:00 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Johannes Berg<johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 16:25 -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> We can now remove that comment about mac80211 requiring > >> cfg80211 and do that for the user. > > > > "now"? What changed to make this possible? > > > > NAK this change, because with it, it's possible to select > > mac80211 = Y > > -> cfg80211 = Y > > while rfkill = M > > > > which will break the kernel build. > > I'm able to do this with current kconfig, does this need to be fixed? I don't think you can select this with the current config since cfg80211 depends on RFKILL == CFG80211 || RFKILL == n. So you can do CFG80211 = m RFKILL = m CFG80211 = * RFKILL = n CFG80211 = * RFKILL = y but NOT CFG80211 = y RFKILL = m johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part