On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:13:50AM +0300, Nick Kossifidis wrote: > You mean have a common reg.h for both ath5k and ath9k ? I meant the existing regulatory, not register, headers -- but if there is stuff to be shared in reg[ister].h we can do that too. > code is much cleaner than ath9k and it's a better place to start, i've > seen most hw > code on ath9k and i'm ready to move on if it's O.K. with you. I guess we should coordinate a bit. I don't have much in the way of unsent patches but perhaps we should pick a specific time to start moving stuff around so we don't all have a pile of rejects. Maybe after 2.6.32 merge window? (This particular patch series, though, is fine enough now I think.) -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
