[Roel Kluin - Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:37:00PM +0200] ... | > I saw one pattern in trace code (not sure if it's | > still there) but personally don't like dynamic | > stack arrays (though at moment the max value | > being passed into routine is known maybe just | > use MAX_RATES instead of (*rates_size)?). Hmm? | | Good point. | | > -- Cyrill | | Thanks, | | I think there was another problem in lbs_associate(), | the memcpy already affected rates->rates. | Yeah, something like that. Note that I was only cared about stack so I didn't dive into details of this code :) I suppose wireless mainteiners will review it more precisely. Thanks Roel! -- Cyrill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
