Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 09:56 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> ACK, is it possible to make it simpler? > > OK, here's my take. > > We only need a native compiler to verify regulatory.bin. I believe it's > orthogonal to building CRDA. > > For someone doing a cross-compilation, it makes no sense to verify the > installed regulatory.bin. Thus, the verification should be optional. > > But the compilation of regdbdump shouldn't be. Firstly, it's installed > by "make install". Secondly, somebody may want to verify regulatory.bin > on the target system. > > Here's the patch: > [snip] Dumb question but, why not just build a target and host version each of regdumpdb? -Philip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
