On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 08:29 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > [54632.657912] No probe response from AP 00:1c:f0:xx:xx:xx after 500ms, try 1 > > [54633.154560] No probe response from AP 00:1c:f0:xx:xx:xx after 500ms, try 2 > > [54873.231210] No probe response from AP 00:1c:f0:xx:xx:xx after 500ms, try 1 > > [55113.467840] No probe response from AP 00:1c:f0:xx:xx:xx after 500ms, try 1 > > [55113.964510] No probe response from AP 00:1c:f0:xx:xx:xx after 500ms, try 2 > > [55114.464516] No probe response from AP 00:1c:f0:xx:xx:xx after 500ms, try 3 > > [55114.967868] No probe response from AP 00:1c:f0:xx:xx:xx after 500ms, try 4 > > [55115.464511] No probe response from AP 00:1c:f0:xx:xx:xx after 500ms, disconnecting. > > > > Should we increase the value to 8 or something? Or just accept that > > sometimes we get a disconnect? > > > I think a disconnect or two aren't a problem, they are always handled > automatically, and can be caused by natural events. > > Even without these patches (I have WPA2, and disconnects were every 4 > five seconds), and still it was possible to use network. > > One disconnect in a day is really nothing to worry about (I have seen > such here as well) > > You can increase try count, probably won't hurt much (each try is 0.5 > seconds, so even 10 tries gives total of 5 seconds, before disconnect on > a really unaccessible AP, anyway) Mind you, each try will end up sending a LOT of probe request frames, iwlwifi sends like 12 frames for every try and never gets a response for some reason, so I wouldn't really increase it much further since you'd be spamming around a lot. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
