On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 10:24 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 08/01/2009 10:21 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Actually, jiffies are unsigned long > > Yeah, this is what I meant. I agree I messed it up when I didn't write > the unsigned explicitly. It might have been confusing, thanks for > pointing out. And, in addition to what you said, the code shouldn't divide jiffies, it should multiply the timeout, add it to the start time, and then use time_is_after_jiffies() or so. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
