On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:43 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Fix it then. Offer an implementation of your superior solution. I just don't think that this patch is a solution because it means that we'll be connected to the AP forever, without knowing anything is wrong, if the AP can reach us but we can't reach the AP (maybe because we have a good Intel card with great sensitivity). Sure -- it's possible to factor in transmit status reports (but remember that not all hardware gives those reliably) or do things on a different schedule etc. But as long as nobody wants to really improve things I don't see why we should take the regression and _remove_ the current behaviour. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
