On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 15:46 -0700, reinette chatre wrote: > Sorry for missing this. We are trying to be better with documentation > and need to do more work in this area. This patch is currently in > wireless-testing. I am not sure how to proceed here. If I send a cleanup > patch on top of current wireless-testing it will only make sense to > address other kernel-doc mishaps. As our driver has not been tested > (afaik) to provide meaningful documentation when kernel-doc is used I am > hesitant to take on this right now ... but it is something we have to > address at some point. Yeah, I know it's not used, and I'm sure there's more -- I was just looking at the code trying to rebase a patch and this caught my eye. It's certainly not too important, but I wanted to point it out anyway if only to avoid that in the future :) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
