On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 12:50 +0800, Chatre, Reinette wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:27 -0700, Zhu, Yi wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 06:12 +0800, Chatre, Reinette wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 01:28 -0700, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Zhu, Yi
> > > > > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 4:42 AM
> > > > > To: Roel Kluin; Winkler, Tomas; Chatre, Reinette
> > > > > Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ipw3945-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > > Andrew Morton
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: Read outside array bounds
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 05:34 +0800, Roel Kluin wrote:
> > > > > > tid is bounded (above) by the size of default_tid_to_tx_fifo (17
> > > > > elements), but
> > > > > > the size of priv->stations[].tid[] is MAX_TID_COUNT (9) elements.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think MAX_TID_COUNT should be defined as 16 or 17. Tomas?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > In general it's 16. In practice we use only 8.
> > >
> > > I think the above statement means that we are mostly using EDCA quality
> > > of service which only uses 8 tids. We do not currently use HCCA (and
> > > thus of course not the hybrid) which would cause more tids to be used.
> > >
> > > A closer look at this flow to this function shows:
> > > rs_tl_turn_on_agg
> >
> > rs_tl_add_packet
> > {
> > ...
> > u8 *qc = ieee80211_get_qos_ctl(hdr);
> > tid = qc[0] & 0xf;
> > ...
> >
> > tl = &lq_data->load[tid];
> > }
> >
> > This should be a problem.
>
> Indeed. Are there any other cases like this that you can think of? It
> seems like we need Roel's fix for iwl_tx_agg_stop also.
Yes. I think we can do an audit for all the ieee80211_ops callbacks with
tid as a parameter. Because mac80211 use u16 for tid, but iwlwifi use u8
internally.
Thanks,
-yi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
