On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 17:52 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 17:10 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > I probably should work more to did these bugs out myself, but anyway I > > want to let you know what I currently see. > > > > First system oopses just after NM starts up, happens always, and after > > planting few test points bug happens somewhere in following lines. > > We are discussing a bug in the scan state machine in another thread, > which could have nasty consequences in not caught. And I don't quite > understand why my system was catching it immediately, maybe because I'm > using gcc 4.4, which has array bounds checking. Yea, there are two patches with same title for this, I applied the newer. Currently thanks to Johannes Berg, the patch [PATCH] nl80211: add missing parameter clearing Fixes this nasty oops, now wireless more or less works, but plenty of problems still, first it oopses on reconnect as inilialized from wpa_supplicant, second iwconfig misses most of its settings, and probably thus NM think signal level is zero. If I switch to good old wext in wpa_supplicant, it works just fine and none of above problems present (I recheck this again to be sure) Thanks, I soon run kmemcheck as well. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky > > I have also seen two oopses in the code unrelated to wireless > networking, one of which lead to my .bash_history becoming empty. > > So please be extra careful. It would be great if somebody could test > the current kernel extensively with kmemcheck an other options and > bisect the bad commit, whether it's wireless related or not. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html