Search Linux Wireless

Re: iwl: potential deadlock?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jiri,

On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 12:34 -0700, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we found a potential deadlock in iwl code by our tool.

What tool is this?

> 
> Can this happen:

I don't think so ...

> iwl_update_tkip_key()
> -> spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->sta_lock)
> -> iwl_send_add_sta()

iwl_send_add_sta() is called here with flags = CMD_ASYNC

In iwl_send_add_sta() we have:
	if (ret || (flags & CMD_ASYNC))
		return ret;

>    -> iwl_sta_ucode_activate()

... so this is not run in this case.

>       -> spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->sta_lock)

Reinette

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux