Tim Schneider wrote:
Am 13.07.2009 um 08:59 schrieb Richard Farina:
I don't mean to make this a flame so please do not take it that way.
How exactly do you expect to get the RECEIVED Signal Strength
indication for a packet which you are SENDING? If you send it, you
don't receive it...
Just my 0.02
-Rick Farina
Hi Rick,
as far, as I understood, the RSSI-Mechanism also displays the signal
strength of the just sent package. I figured there was some way the
MAC-Layer transported that information, but you're right, I could be
mistaken. Anyways, since I'm trying to implement a TCP Algorithm, i
definitely have a two-way connection. Assuming, that the route back
is going to be the same as it was on the way there (which basically
should be true, based on the Routing algorithms we're using in our
wireless mesh network), I could just use the RSSI Value of the
received ACK.
Any RSSI on a sent packet will be a calculated number not an observed
number and as such it will be completely pointless for any kind of rate
control algorithm. Assuming that the card could actually receive the
packets it is sending (which it can't) then you would be observing a
24dBm signal (for instance) with 0 patch loss and your RSSI would be at
or above max. Realistically you can assume that every packet you sent
has a max RSSI on your end because you are the one transmitting it.
Now, if you want to know what the RSSI on the receiver side is that is a
completely different question, one which you cannot answer at all. When
you send a packet you do not have the good fortune to know what RSSI the
receiver got. You can roughly assume based on your RSSI when you get an
ACK, but honestly that isn't even close to correct because every packet
has a very unique experience in the air and you cannot assume things
like the same tx power and rx sensitivity will be the same on both
ends. There is some 802.11 protocol (the letter eludes me at present)
which is in draft form which adds information to packets so that both
ends know each other's RSSI, but I have never seen it implemented
anywhere yet.
I advise you keep the discussion on list as I am by no means an expert
and many people much better at this than I may respond.
-Rick Farina
Regards,
Tim Schneider
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
