On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 22:09 +0100, Darren Salt wrote: > I demand that Johannes Berg may or may not have written... > > > Apparently there actually _are_ tools that try to set this in sysfs even > > though it wasn't supposed to be used this way without claiming first. > > Then it should have been documented as such. I don't see anything about this > in Documentation/rfkill.txt (as found in 2.6.30), other than a vague > statement that "Kernel handles events", which isn't exactly helpful :-\ Oh, it's not just that rfkill was horrible, the documentation matched :) All the SHOUTING in it about what you must and must not do but nothing actually helpful :) > > *shrug*, I don't like it, but whatever... > > I do. It means that we have a nice simple text-based interface for use in > scripts (for now), and a binary interface which is better suited to the likes > of desktop applications. Indeed, and as long as you expect to only use soft toggle... problem is that you won't know whether it's soft-toggled or not while it's hard-blocked (off)! > > Please test & report. > > With the patch applied, Bluetooth toggling is working again, so you get to > add this: > > Tested-By: Darren Salt <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Ok, John, please pick up the patch. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
