On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 18:04 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > diff --git a/net/wireless/scan.c b/net/wireless/scan.c > index e95b638..f8e71b3 100644 > --- a/net/wireless/scan.c > +++ b/net/wireless/scan.c > @@ -366,7 +366,6 @@ cfg80211_bss_update(struct cfg80211_registered_device *dev, > found = rb_find_bss(dev, res); > > if (found) { > - kref_get(&found->ref); > found->pub.beacon_interval = res->pub.beacon_interval; > found->pub.tsf = res->pub.tsf; > found->pub.signal = res->pub.signal; > > I'll try this later today to see if it fixes the leak. If that's not > correct, I'll post more information about the content of the reported > object (in general, it shouldn't be on any valid list or rb tree since > kmemleak can't find it). I have already sent that exact patch. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part