On Sun, 05 Jul 2009, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 10:24 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > This is good, but not complete. Changes to the API that don't change the > > size (or those which reduces it) are a problem: they are impossible with a > > schema that detects API version by the size alone. > > Umm, no, we can also add operations as required already. Yeah, I know. What we can't do is to change the current ones, or drop them. > _subtlety_ involved in actually doing a size change, nothing more. A > real event version is _not_ necessary at all. In fact, I would argue > that basing _anything_ on the "version" rather than the "feature set" is > useless. IMO version can tell you the supported feature set, but one could use a feature set bitmap as well if one wanted. Anyway, if you guys deem the current way good enough, I am fine with it. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
