On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 15:36 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 02:35:00PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > > > That's really all I > > care about, I don't want another WEXT-based driver accepted; I want all > > the new ones using cfg80211. > > Now there is a discussion we should have had in Berlin...is it time > to insist on cfg80211-based configuration for all new drivers? Can't imagine there would have been much discussion on that with the crowd that was there -- I think we should. In fact, on the notes was "publish a wext deprecation statement" or something like that. Just like we insist that nobody adds an entirely new wireless stack, we should insist that nobody add a new way of interpreting wext commands. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
