On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 15:43 +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 01:09:16PM +0530, Johannes Berg wrote: > > The IEEE80211_STA_TKIP_WEP_USED flag is used internally to > > disable HT when WEP or TKIP are used. Now that cfg80211 is > > giving us the required information, we can set the flag > > appropriately again. > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > net/mac80211/cfg.c | 10 +++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > --- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/cfg.c 2009-07-01 09:01:25.000000000 +0200 > > +++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/cfg.c 2009-07-01 09:09:01.000000000 +0200 > > @@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ static int ieee80211_assoc(struct wiphy > > struct cfg80211_assoc_request *req) > > { > > struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata; > > - int ret; > > + int ret, i; > > > > sdata = IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev); > > > > @@ -1236,6 +1236,14 @@ static int ieee80211_assoc(struct wiphy > > !(sdata->u.mgd.flags & IEEE80211_STA_AUTHENTICATED)) > > return -ENOLINK; /* not authenticated */ > > > > + sdata->u.mgd.flags &= ~IEEE80211_STA_TKIP_WEP_USED; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < req->crypto.n_ciphers_pairwise; i++) > > + if (req->crypto.ciphers_pairwise[i] == WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP40 || > > + req->crypto.ciphers_pairwise[i] == WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_TKIP || > > + req->crypto.ciphers_pairwise[i] == WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP104) > > + sdata->u.mgd.flags |= IEEE80211_STA_TKIP_WEP_USED; > > + > > for..loop does not seem to be necessary here as it is very unlikely that > an assoc req will have more than one cipher suite. True, but so far we've defined the API that way. Should we redefine the API? I keep forgetting what is valid where. Jouni? > I'm not sure if this patch series will get into 2.6.31-rc, if it > does not, we may need a variant of this patch to fix > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13630, I'll work on it. > Thanks!. I don't think we can. Even the above patch relies on wpa_supplicant to pass us the correct information. Otherwise we would have to parse the IEs, which is somewhat ugly. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part