On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 10:47 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 16:18 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Always use the wiphy name instead. > > No objections against the patch. > > Maybe we could use wiphy names for the network devices? That is, > wmaster0 would become phy0 and so on. Using two names for the same > thing is confusing. What's better is that we won't have wmaster0 > corresponding to phy1 after the driver is reloaded. We'll have "phy1" > in both namespaces. > > I wish we could hide those master devices using some "hidden network > device" attribute, but it's not happening. Actually, the reason I'm posting this patch is that I'm killing the mdev. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
