2009/6/4 John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 03:16:34PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 05:32:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:54:44 +0400
>> > Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> > > + switch (addr->addr_type) {
>> > > + case IEEE802154_ADDR_LONG:
>> > > + rtnl_lock();
>> > > + dev = dev_getbyhwaddr(net, ARPHRD_IEEE802154, addr->hwaddr);
>> > > + if (dev)
>> > > + dev_hold(dev);
>> > > + rtnl_unlock();
>> > > + break;
>> > > + case IEEE802154_ADDR_SHORT:
>> > > + if (addr->pan_id != 0xffff && addr->short_addr != IEEE802154_ADDR_UNDEF && addr->short_addr != 0xffff) {
>> > > + struct net_device *tmp;
>> > > +
>> > > + rtnl_lock();
>> > > +
>> > > + for_each_netdev(net, tmp) {
>> > > + if (tmp->type == ARPHRD_IEEE802154) {
>> > > + if (IEEE802154_MLME_OPS(tmp)->get_pan_id(tmp) == addr->pan_id
>> > > + && IEEE802154_MLME_OPS(tmp)->get_short_addr(tmp) == addr->short_addr) {
>> >
>> > You must use very wide xterms :(
>>
>> ~120 chars in width :) We prefer to have a single code line split between
>> several screen lines, rather than split it manually in some weird places
>> just to justify width of 80 chars.
>
> Hopefully you realize that many find this difficult to read -- I just
> can't spread my eyes far enough to comprehend the lines.
>
> 80 chars is not a hard limit, but it is a good goal. 120 is too wide.
We do try to fit the lines into 80 chars, but when that seems logical.
I strongly dislike breaking comparations between lines.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
