On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 11:08 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:00:50AM -0700, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 14:01 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > Thanks, yeah I see where I was making an incorrect assumption here. > > > > > > There still is a case here where userpsace can try to add a sta twice > > > and the second parameters passed would be ignored. > > > > Don't we show that -EEXIST to userspace then? I thought we did. > > We do, but why don't we *first* try to check for its existence? Because that's racy -- after the check completes and before we go try to insert a station might have come to life. Well, it might actually be ok due to external factors (AP mode _only_ gets stations from userspace) but it seems better to not rely on that. What problem were you trying to solve btw? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
