On Tuesday 02 June 2009 22:04:39 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 16:41 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > > --- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/net/wireless/b43/Kconfig 2009-06-02 12:53:36.000000000 +0200 > > > +++ wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/b43/Kconfig 2009-06-02 12:56:11.000000000 +0200 > > > @@ -98,13 +98,6 @@ config B43_LEDS > > > depends on B43 && MAC80211_LEDS && (LEDS_CLASS = y || LEDS_CLASS = B43) > > > default y > > > > > > -# This config option automatically enables b43 RFKILL support, > > > -# if it's possible. > > > -config B43_RFKILL > > > - bool > > > - depends on B43 && (RFKILL = y || RFKILL = B43) > > > - default y > > > > Don't you need to add a new "depends on" to "B43", if you remove this? > > Or is rfkill always compiled in if wireless is present? > > Well, rfkill isn't always present but the APIs are always present. Ok, makes sense, so I guess you rewrote the API. ;) I'll ack this, if somebody with rfkill device tests it. Unfortunately I don't have such a device. -- Greetings, Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
