On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 09:12 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 12:05:04AM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote: > > nl80211_michael_mic_failure can be called in atomic context but > > does a GFP_KERNEL allocation. Fixes the error below: > > This is not the first one of these. Anyone care to audit nl80211.c for others? We should just make them all take a gfp_t argument and use that instead so the caller gets to specify it... Anyone want to do that? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part