This comment suggested storing two pieces of state in the LLC skb control block, and in fact we do. Someone did the implementation but never killed this todo comment :-) Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/llc/llc_conn.c | 4 ---- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/llc/llc_conn.c b/net/llc/llc_conn.c index 3477624..c6bab39 100644 --- a/net/llc/llc_conn.c +++ b/net/llc/llc_conn.c @@ -79,10 +79,6 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) if (unlikely(!ev->ind_prim && !ev->cfm_prim)) { /* indicate or confirm not required */ - /* XXX this is not very pretty, perhaps we should store - * XXX indicate/confirm-needed state in the llc_conn_state_ev - * XXX control block of the SKB instead? -DaveM - */ if (!skb->next) goto out_kfree_skb; goto out_skb_put; -- 1.6.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html