On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 23:55 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > As long as the missing userspace control functionality (the lack of which is > a _serious_ regression for platform drivers) is added before 2.6.31 ships, I > have no complains. > > Userspace must be able to change the (soft) state using sysfs. This is > not an optional part of rfkill :-) I'm sorry, but you're wrong. Before I removed it, almost all drivers disabled that functionality. We do want to add it back, but certainly not with the mostly braindead interface it used to have. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
