Hi Yi, > > > FIRMWARE_NAME_MAX is defined 30 at this time. > > > > I think we need to fix this. Especially since all the other name > > length limits in the driver model are gone. > > I agree. Should we fix this by simply increasing FIRMWARE_NAME_MAX to > some acceptable length (what should it be? btw) or there are other > better ideas? I think just increasing the length of the static array is bad. Can we just not allocated the needed length for the firmware filename? > Anyway, I think whatever how we change FW_LOADER, this patch should > still go. Because the "lmac" string doesn't make any sense in this file > name due to calibration is only done in LMAC. If you think that the lmac string is pointless anyway, then that is fine. Changing the name, because of a FW_LOADER limitation should not be done of course. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
