On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 15:09 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > > Isn't lib80211 a better place for those ? > > Its purpose is sharing code between fullmac and softmac drivers. > > These functions are moved from mac80211 which currently doesn't link > with lib80211. Johannes might have more to comment. Yeah, lib80211's stated purpose is to share code, but on the other hand code that mac80211 and fullmac drivers may need seems better suited in cfg80211 since lib80211 also ships a large code bit of crypto routines etc. that are just useless for this and mac80211. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
