On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 07:37:28PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > You know ... somehow I managed to send out v2 with a wrong interval. > > This was supposed to be / 5 not / 20, should I send a separate patch or > would you roll this into the original? The commit log says 200ms, but > the code uses 50ms which is far too short. > > johannes > > --- > net/mac80211/mlme.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/mlme.c 2009-05-19 19:36:00.564057102 +0200 > +++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/mlme.c 2009-05-19 19:36:04.773067791 +0200 > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ > #define IEEE80211_ASSOC_TIMEOUT (HZ / 5) > #define IEEE80211_ASSOC_MAX_TRIES 3 > #define IEEE80211_MONITORING_INTERVAL (2 * HZ) > -#define IEEE80211_PROBE_WAIT (HZ / 20) > +#define IEEE80211_PROBE_WAIT (HZ / 5) > #define IEEE80211_PROBE_IDLE_TIME (60 * HZ) > #define IEEE80211_RETRY_AUTH_INTERVAL (1 * HZ) Crud, I didn't realize I had already pushed that patch to Dave M. Could you submit this as a separate patch? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
