On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 10:23 -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > one other thing that comes to my mind is to have a convenient "iw scan" > alias to just trigger scanning all all interfaces. The "dev wlan0" thing > is driving my crazy. And most people just have one card only anyway. That would be hell to coordinate with all the waiting and stuff... > Do we really need the "dev" versus "phy" details here. I guess they are > needed in case someone renames "wlan0" to "phy0" by accident, but > personally I prefer that the "dev" one is optional and it falls back to > just use the interface name. Personally, I'd rather have bash completion ;) And it's not so simple I think. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part