On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 10:48 -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > Both are HT. > > do we have the specs somewhere then I might can give it a try. Also WMM > needs some improvements. The IEs are defined in structs in include/linux/ieee80211.h. > > > The other one that keeps showing up in my area is: > > > > > > Unknown IE (47): 06 > > > > "Broadcom proprietary" -- seems it would make sense to ignore that. > > Since it not showing up until you give -u there is no need to ignore it, > but where do you find that this is Broadcom proprietary and why the f* > they get to use an official IE number? Check the link I gave you - lots of companies have IEs rather than vendor IEs, predates the vendor IE I guess. > > > And I do have some other vendor specific ones, that I don't really care > > > about and we might even never know what they are: > > > > > > Vendor specific: OUI 00:03:7f, data: 01 01 00 17 00 00 > > > Vendor specific: OUI 00:03:7f, data: 02 01 01 4d 00 03 a4 00 00 > > > Vendor specific: OUI 00:03:2f, data: 01 00 01 > > > > You can check wireshark, sometimes it has something useful. I think > > there are pre-wifi HT IEs too in some vendor IE, might be one of these. > > > > https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/documents?x_dcn=31&x_year=2009 is useful > > too (at least for 2009, for next year somebody will have to find the DCN > > again) > > I found an indication of what bit 1 of extended capabilities means. I do > have seen an AP with that somewhere around :) Actually extended capabilities aren't bits but values, I think? But that's something about HT too, iirc. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
