On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 09:09 -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > Certainly. I just don't want to have it crash on an AP that advertises
> > completely bogus information :)
>
> if nobody beats me to it, then I will fix this. Just have to deal with
> some other stuff first.
Alright, thanks. Not too pressing I guess. Just should be done before I
cut the next release.
> tried the RSN/WPA2 too, but it is too long :)
>
> On a different note, what is your preferred coding style for loops?
>
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>
> or
>
> for(i=0; i<len-3; i++)
>
> I was using the latter one since I assumed that is what you want (it is
> not my preferred one). Then I realized that you are using both or that
> something slipped in. Do you want me to send a patch to fix this?
Oh, well, I prefer the former, but some other people put in the latter,
and I didn't really care too much. No need to send a patch though.
johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
