On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 21:38 +0300, Jouni Malinen wrote: > --- uml.orig/net/mac80211/mlme.c 2009-04-22 21:04:47.000000000 +0300 > +++ uml/net/mac80211/mlme.c 2009-04-22 21:10:57.000000000 +0300 > @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static void ieee80211_authenticate(struc > " timed out\n", > sdata->dev->name, ifmgd->bssid); > ifmgd->state = IEEE80211_STA_MLME_DISABLED; > - ieee80211_sta_send_apinfo(sdata); > + cfg80211_send_auth_timeout(sdata->dev, ifmgd->bssid); > ieee80211_rx_bss_remove(sdata, ifmgd->bssid, > sdata->local->hw.conf.channel->center_freq, > ifmgd->ssid, ifmgd->ssid_len); > @@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ static void ieee80211_associate(struct i > " timed out\n", > sdata->dev->name, ifmgd->bssid); > ifmgd->state = IEEE80211_STA_MLME_DISABLED; > - ieee80211_sta_send_apinfo(sdata); > + cfg80211_send_assoc_timeout(sdata->dev, ifmgd->bssid); > ieee80211_rx_bss_remove(sdata, ifmgd->bssid, > sdata->local->hw.conf.channel->center_freq, > ifmgd->ssid, ifmgd->ssid_len); > --- uml.orig/net/wireless/mlme.c 2009-04-22 20:54:06.000000000 +0300 I think you also need to send this if the direct probe step didn't work? Or do we skip that for nl80211 commands? It normally won't be done since we've just scanned, but ... johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
