Search Linux Wireless

Re: [Proposal]TX flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 02:33:05AM +0200, G?bor Stefanik wrote:
> I propose the following suggested Radiotap features to be standardised:
> 
> * A new, 16-bit wide "TX flags" field (field number 15), containing
> the following flags:
>    - TX failed due to excessive retries,
>    - CTS-to-self protection,
>    - RTS/CTS-handshake,
>    - Frame shall not be ACKed ("No-ACK"), and
>    - Sequence number shall not be recalculated ("No-Seq").

Thanks.

FWIW, these assignments are compatible with NetBSD.  They appear to be
compatible with FreeBSD, too.

> If no one objects to this proposal in 7 days, I will resubmit it as a
> formal RFA, to allow eventual adoption.

Great!

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung@xxxxxxxxxxx      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux