On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 07:39 -0400, Forest Bond wrote: > > Can we also please add files here saying to not bother the > > linux-wireless list about this crap? > > I would assume this is somewhat implied for any code in drivers/staging. Is > that not the case? It seems to be on a per case basis -- and there's one driver at least (agnx) that we actually do care about because it is there only because it's incomplete not because the code is in some way problematic (like using its own 802.11 stack) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
