On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 13:38 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:>>> >> switch (ht_info->ht_param & IEEE80211_HT_PARAM_CHA_SEC_OFFSET) {>> >> case IEEE80211_HT_PARAM_CHA_SEC_ABOVE:>> >> if (flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_HT40PLUS) {>> >> cap &= ~IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40;>> >> cap &= ~IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SGI_40;>> >> }>> >> break;>> >> case IEEE80211_HT_PARAM_CHA_SEC_BELOW:>> >> if (flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_HT40MINUS) {>> >> cap &= ~IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40;>> >> cap &= ~IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SGI_40;>> >> }>> >>> > Yeah, that looks ok.>>>> That's what was there or what I added in my patches.>> Indeed, it's already there. I guess I got confused, sorry for the noise.
hehe, np, are these ACKed now then?
Luis��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���zW����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
