On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:33 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > Well, I suppose you could register with the max and later reduce and > > stop the remaining queues you're not using... Or not stop them and drop > > packets on them. That's somewhat fragile, gives people who look at tc a > > wrong idea, and I can't imagine supporting it, but it should work. > > mkay, I'll try this. thanks :) > > I wonder, however, will mac80211 try to queue packets on queues that are stopped? > And I think just dropping them is not an option, because this will cause breakage. > > What about just queueing everything on a single queue, no matter what queue mac80211 > puts the frame into? Would this cause ordering issues? > Or the other way around, is there anything that _depends_ on the higher priority queues > to get sent before the higher priority queues? mac80211 won't try to select a queue higher than hw->queues at select_queue time, so it shouldn't try to put packets onto that queue, look in wme.c. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
