Search Linux Wireless

Re: wireless powersaving (in NM?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 11:39 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:

> However, by putting the burden onto drivers, drivers can choose a
> conservative power saving level when no application has registered its
> pm_qos requirements

Actually, should it? I'm now thinking that defaulting to a high latency
sleep state would sort of be required by the pm_qos API -- after all if
nobody registers a latency requirement then there is no latency
requirement!

I think we need some GUI though to adjust this -- like the "inhibit
screensaver" applet that exists -- so that users of applications that
don't register requirements can still do something useful.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux