On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > Just for the record, as long as you (or somebody else) takes over maintainership > over rfkill after these changes, I have no objections against the changes. Luckily > you already updated the Maintainers entry, so I'm happy. :) > > I know rfkill was poorly designed and I simply lacked the time (and perhaps > some interest as well) to continue with it. The changes you propose sound > reasonable so I hope it will turn rfkill really into something which it was supposed > to be from the start. Agreed. I never wanted to do so much work on rfkill, either... I just wanted something I could use in thinkpad-acpi, but that proved to be a lot of work, as once you start, you want to finish it. I will go over the new proposed rfkill to check if it is in a state that is comfortable for drivers like thinkpad-acpi to use, and offer comments about it. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
