On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 11:54 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Monday 30 March 2009 11:06:27 Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 19:53 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > This patch completely rewrites the rfkill core to address > > > the following deficiencies: > > > > > > * all rfkill drivers need to implement polling where necessary > > > rather than having one central implementation > > > > One thing I was wondering about -- should we just implement polling via > > a single work struct that iterates all those rfkill drivers that need > > polling? I've given them each an own right now, but that seems > > unnecessary. > > If it doesn't add new locking problems (global locks, etc...) that'd be OK. Hm, indeed, it probably would -- rfkill_register needs a global lock while being called from the driver, and the polling would need the same lock while calling into the driver. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
