On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 20:01 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> Unfortunately, 1) and 3) are only done if the driver is first to > >> reply to the aggregation request, it is, however, possible that the > >> remote station replies before the driver! Thus, unify the code for > >> this and call the new function ieee80211_agg_tx_operational in both > >> places where TX aggregation can become operational. > >> > >> Additionally, rename the driver notification from > >> IEEE80211_AMPDU_TX_RESUME to IEEE80211_AMPDU_TX_OPERATIONAL. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Nice catch man! > > > > Reviewed-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hm, maybe also a backported version could go to stable? Perhaps we can > trigger a panic on a UP box? No need -- ath9k always replies _instantly_, and iwlwifi doesn't support aggregation in stable. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
