On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 08:15 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Please CC me on replies. > > > > > > --- a/db.txt 2009-03-25 19:38:22.838975857 +0100 > > +++ b/db.txt 2009-03-25 19:39:37.722248019 +0100 > > @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ > > country DE: > > # entries 279004 and 280006 > > (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW) > > - # entries 303005 and 304002 > > - (5150 - 5255 @ 40), (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS > > + # entries 303005, 304002 and 305002 > > + (5150 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS > > # entries 308002 and 309001 > > (5470 - 5650 @ 40), (N/A, 1000 mW), DFS Also, the 5250-5350 range requires TPC, but we haven't covered that requirement yet I think we need to use the lower EIRP limit of 100 mW. I guess we should also update 5470-5650 to 5470-5725 and take into account the TCP limitation (500 mW max power then instead of 1W) which I seem to have gotten wrong too. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
