On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 11:26 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Could we use some newfangled thing like tracepoints for this > >> instead of printk? Disclaimer: I know nothing about such > >> things. > > > > Probably. Want to look at how to do that? :) > > Sure, I'll do some research and see what's involved. Don't hold > up the patch on my account though. Oh doesn't matter to me -- I was posting it more because I did it, I don't have an immediate need to have it included. If you want to take some time to look into that we can hold the patch without any trouble, I agree it would probably be nicer, just didn't work with any of that stuff before so I didn't even think of it. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
