On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 15:48 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > It is not accurate to say Sujith has extensively tested this for > > ath9k, he probably just ran it a few times. So I cannot say we are as > > comfortable with the patches as you or Intel seem to be already. Indeed, both Sujith and I just gave it a few test runs. Given that ath9k enables aggregation on the first packet always though, the code was definitely exercised. > Given Luis's objection I'm inclined to delay. I have asked > him to try to "get comfortable" with this patch series over the next > few days. If that happens, then I'll try to get this merged during > the window. Fair enough. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
